Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Fortunejack changing license and country to avoid paying winners: flag created
by
Rating Place
on 12/03/2025, 01:55:43 UTC
OP, again, can you give me a summary of what happened? I believe the evidence provided is enough [though I only glanced at it], all I need now is the narrative to understand the situation, and I'll nudge ADante [the successor of the previous FJ rep that handle your case] to take a look from their side and perhaps help explaining what happened to him as he himself is quite in the dark too, given the issue happened before his time.

I’ll try. They basically took lots of sports bets, of which 4 won. For these 4 that won, they were placed on the same match. They’ve waited about 3 to 4 hours for the bet results, then almost immediately after result say “these bets are identical, so according to our terms and conditions we are only paying bet 1 and stealing your winnings from bets 2, 3 and 4”. Bets 3 and 4 are clearly different at least in wording and meaning than bets 1 and 2. Court was pretty harsh, rejected almost all of my lawyers arguments, but still ruled bet 3 was different than bet 1 and that they wrongfully “voided” it. Bet 3 is almost 85% of the stolen winnings. Their terms and conditions say court of Curacao has the final word in all disputes, except that during legal procedure they changed country.

In summary, they took up bets, waited for results, then refused to pay out winnings. Pretty simple stuff that God will send them to hell for it if some of some them are not already there.

For more details you can read the judgement.


Quote
Reference is made to the lettering and numbering above
bet (2) void.
match) as "Which Team wins the Rest of the Game". Nexus has declared
Bet (3) is not identical to bet (1): "Fulltime Result" is not the same
in wording (and also in meaning at the time of half-time of the
bet (3) void without right.
consider these to be part of the bet because it is not a future uncertain
Bet (4) is identical to bet (3) except for the odds. The Court does not
(partial) outcome of a sports event, on the occurrence of which
bets can be placed. Nexus has rightly declared bet (4) invalid

Bet 3 was live and considered void?