This is your case -
https://casino.guru/stake-casino-player-suspects-casino-s-in-house-blackjack ? Have to dig CG to find the best match. Though the username is difference with the one used here, the writing style indicate it is yours.
They closed your case because you can't provide supporting evidence to back up your claim.
It's no one's fault but yours if you can't present a case with compelling basis for a rebuttal. Case on point, you come to the police and say your neighbor stole 30,000 USD from you. When they ask for evidence, you gave them an opinion of what you think should be happening instead of evidence-backed-fact.
https://talkimg.com/images/2025/02/27/qgQ7w.jpegIf you would have taken the time to read the complaint conversation with Casino Clown, you would (or should) have seen that they didn't close my case because I can't provide supporting evidence to back up my claim. Rolleye
The complaint clown Nick clearly informed that Casino Clown isn't competent to handle my case here:
Quote complaint clown Nick: "Sometimes you might get lucky and sometimes not; that's how casinos and casino games work. I would recommend reading our article about Payout ratio (RTP):
https://casino.guru/learn-about-games-of-chance-rtp-variance."
So when you won you were lucky and when you lost you were unlucky! L
This nonsense excusation confirms that Casino Clown and complaint clown Nick are totally unaware that there is a law of large numbers which determines the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome!
They are also not able to conclude that when you lost a higher percentage than technically maximal possible, that confirms that the game or system is rigged!
