[...]
@holydarkness, don’t bother throwing out challenges or acting like you’re above suspicion. In this world, anything is possible, and given the way you defend these casinos, it wouldn’t be surprising if you were tied to Curacao’s shady operations yourself.
Holydarkness, your attempt to flip the narrative is a classic deflection tactic. You keep harping on "fabricated statements" but conveniently ignore the real issue—why do you spend so much time defending casinos with a known history of fraud?
You say you’re not involved, yet every time Stake or other shady casinos are called out, you rush in to discredit victims and shift the conversation. That’s not the behavior of a neutral observer; that’s the behavior of someone with skin in the game.
Instead of trying to gaslight people with vague accusations, why don’t you address the real questions?
Why does Stake refuse to provide full bet histories under GDPR requests?
Why does their RTP significantly deviate from what’s advertised?
Why did StakeExposed.com get wiped from archives?
If you actually cared about transparency, you'd demand answers instead of running defense for a billion-dollar gambling empire. But we both know that’s not your job, is it?