The copyright part is different, usually that's not a problem unless the copyright owner chases you down. But the chatbots themselves could very well be violating copyright laws on a massive scale. They must have used almost anything ever written as input, and I bet they didn't get permission from millions of different authors to reproduce it.
I see another problem, and that is developers behind the scenes who are telling this bots what information to copy and what not to copy.
We can already see that all AI tools have a huge bias and they are not neutral in most cases, but clearly influenced by people who paid for them to be created.
it's pretty much confirmed at this point that every AI company that has its own model has violated copyright laws in some way to train their models.
facebook for example, had court documents confirming that they torrented a shit ton of books to train their Llama model.
I think they also violated and abused everyone who is using chrome browser and other g00gle products, because they clearly used all of us for AI training, without our consent.
Is that plagiarism?
Again, it shouldn't be because I would assume that the AI is working with prompts and detailed information you fed it about your company. It isn't just making things up on its own or copying what it found from another thread.
[/quote]
I tested Brave AI few times and this crap clearly invented some stuff by mixing true and false information into one big mess.