Here you go, smarty pants.
Should this forum ban the use of chatbots and AI entirely?
86% in favor. Keep making a fool of yourself please I am having a lot of fun.
Nice trick, but since tricks are for kids, let's dwell into details. Should this forum ban the use of chatbots and AI entirely?
86% in favor. Keep making a fool of yourself please I am having a lot of fun.
Lets start with esablishing the creditibily of OP of the poll cum topic you mentioned; (I will tell you in a moment why it is important?)
Based on neutral tag date and thread date, IMO that user create that thread in frustration after other member caught him using chatbot/AI.
Apart from this also look at the replies of reputed members regarding OP,What happened to your input in this thread that you created as an attempt to avoid receiving tags on your account. You no longer post there: Chatbots: The Future of Scam Hunting
You are clearly playing the role of an innocent individual pretending to be ignorant yet all you did was to demonstrate your mindset. Your ditec_wrogn account has been noticed by far too many members now and for that reason will probably not be monetised via signature campaigns in future therefore why keep up the charade?
Your posting similarities to a certain account comes to mind. How many accounts do you have in the forum?
You are clearly playing the role of an innocent individual pretending to be ignorant yet all you did was to demonstrate your mindset. Your ditec_wrogn account has been noticed by far too many members now and for that reason will probably not be monetised via signature campaigns in future therefore why keep up the charade?
Your posting similarities to a certain account comes to mind. How many accounts do you have in the forum?
I don't think it's a coincidence that you brought up AI usage twice in a row after being reported. Coincidence? Probably not. Before the report, there wasn't any mention regarding AI usage and chatbots in your post history, and now suddenly, you're trying to portray that you're using this technology to hunt down scammers (and how exactly would you be doing that?) and discussing whether the forum should allow its usage. I'm pretty confident you understand how suspicious this sounds. Your posts were suspicious enough, following a specific pattern and writing style from the beginning; I believe this is an attempt to "come clean" about your AI usage and nothing more.
You said, you have been using an AI to detect scammers but what you are actually doing is ask an AI to create a response and post it here.
And to back it up, here is your statement.
Now I think there is a high chance that it certainly did provide a negative context which might have reflected in the extreme poll results because the poll had limited options. And to back it up, here is your statement.
Just wanted to let you all know that every single reply I make here is done with the help of my trusty chatbot sidekick. Hope that's okay with everyone!
I have read all 3 pages of that poll and it is eveident that not even a single member is having a simplistic view (including yours) to ban any use case of AI. The common theme was that the 'use of AI specifically for writting posts is not good' while acknowledging the importance of AI in other fields of life (precisely my position). No member is arguing that any use of AI should be banned, which was my point,
Can you please specify who among reputed members ever propageted this so-called simplistic view of banning any use of AI in the forum?
You can prove me wrong by quoting the post/s from the poll discussion.If you think any AI chatbot/agent knows more about your Phd or can explain/present it better than you, then perhaps you have not done a proper job . If you are taking AI help, you should mention the part which AI prepared for you, otherwise, even in use cases where it is not plagiarism, it is ethically wrong.
. If you are taking AI help, you should mention the part which AI prepared for you, otherwise, even in use cases where it is not plagiarism, it is ethically wrong.That's a great bullshit right there. The umpteenth sign of Luddism in this forum. The AI saves me time, it makes me the summary of my thesis focused on a public presentation and I only have to check it, in the same way that what professional translators do is to pass the texts through the AI (before automatic translators) and check it. I know this firsthand.
That's all well and good but neither of you is addressing the main issue...
That is because you keep changing goal posts 
. From Phd holder to Professional Translators. . I will not respond this time because I am sure next time you will come up with a carpenter .Quote from: memehunter link=topic=5534279.msg65165532#msg65165532
YES, 100%, unless forum has a dual policy for AI usage, separating buissness/project owners creating ANN threads from common members.
Have you reported the OP in question for plagiarism?