if you want to prove otherwise start bringing here quotes from reputable members defending the use of AI in the forum. Or open threads defending its use by those reputable members, because saying that if threads were opened in this respect as ABCbits says, the outcome would be favorable is a giant mountain of bullshit. I say this from experience because I am the only one who opens threads about it and it has only been after quite a while because the initial general reaction was totally negative.
I never shifted the burden of proof on you (although we both were making claims). I did bear that by going through all the posts in the poll thread you suggested. Now that I have provided my argument by stating the dominant theme of the thread you want me to quote 30+ replies (sending alarms to so many members) here, no thank you.
Also stop strawmaning (I know you have years of practice but try it) every time. I never said reputable members are defending use of AI. I said they do not have a simplistic view of banning any AI usage in this forum.
Although I agree with ABCbits and can open a thread asking for open voting if you are willing to make a bet ($100 onwards). The title will be, 'Do you have a simplistic view of banning any AI usage in this forum?' Yes or NO.
Now, let's see you put your money where your mouth is.
No, and I have already explained my
reasons in this thread in a 100% similar case.
So what bullshit were you saying about forum policy? If the forum rules considered plagiarism using an AI to present your business the OP would have been banned long ago and the thread trashed.
Please read again, hopefully, you will find another strawman.