I think you misunderstood my statement. What i meant was whether the percentage distribution (Yes, No and Miscellaneous). And by highly-reputable member, i mean the one who create such thread (along with the pool) rather than their statement.
No, I did not misunderstand. Thinking about what would have happened if something different had happened than what actually happened is something common in us humans, but we must be aware that it is a matter of philosophy, of mental speculation.
And as I have also said, I have created a few threads on the subject and what I have received is mostly negative or skeptical opinions some even delusional by what the ass-kisser calls highly reputed members. That is a fact about what has happened.
If you see my thread you will see that:
Acceptable uses of AI in the forum (unofficial)In it we have, among other things, a so-called highly reputed member who insisted
until I reported my own post and was marked as bad that using AI as a search engine and posting links contravened the forum rules.
A
troll thread in response to defend that there is no legitimate AI thread on the forum that received 11 merits by another so-called highly reputed member, although he did qualify that there is only one legitimate use. I listed as many as 9.
This very thread, in which we are talking about someone who uses the AI to make the presentation of his business and comes
another so-called highly reputed member, to protest that the moderators do not act in many case against AI copy-paste, which is false and has nothing to do more than tangentially with the subject of the thread.
Another so-called highly reputed member
who equates any use of AI with verbal diarrhea in this and other threads.
These are all facts about what happened, not about what might have happened if what happened had not happened, and there are plenty more on the forum.
Now, does it make any sense to raise a poll on the rules I raise? No, because whoever opposes it will be making a fool of himself. I opened this thread because so far the forum has only seen AI from the negative point of view, as if AI can only be used for copy-paste without citing the source, or perhaps to post an AI image generated to make a joke.
I have been using AI on a daily basis for many months, outside of the forum, and I have never used it to copy-paste something generated by it without citing the source.