@Symphonized
You claim that every Scam accusation will be analysed very soon:
I'm always forwarding Scam accusations from this section to Staff so they can be handled.
PS: I'm the one in charge of forwarding them, in case Staff misses these topics, therefore every Stake.com Scam accusation will be viewed / analysed very soon.
But this isn't true!
If they would have analysed the info and proof about their provably rigged in-house Black Jack, they would have come to the conclusion that it is rigged!
Instead they made the following nonsense declaration:
The user has reached out to the complaints department more than 30 times for the same inquiry.
We have provided the user with the requested information and guided them on validating the license in accordance with Antillephones' preferred procedures.
The User has also been attempting to claim that the 8048/JAZ license is invalid for cryptocurrencies.
Our system allows users to access their complete bet history from the date of registration, and there is no limit on the data storage.
All data stored under the "bet archive" and other sections of your account, are protected by our License, which we strictly adhere to.
For the Blackjack game, users can easily filter data in their bet archive spreadsheet.
Our licensing information and regulations have been transparently available on our website since Stake's inception.
Upon registration, the User acknowledges and accepts our Terms of Service which provide information the above and also provides this clearly.
Prior to using our services, it's crucial for users to comprehend the inherent risks associated with gambling, as winning cannot be guaranteed.
Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.
In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.
Overall, the frivolous claims made by this User have been explained to them many times by Support and other members of the community:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.400.
It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.
How stupid a multi-billion USD profit online casino operation can be?While the
exact house edge applies only after 1 million bets, the law of great numbers determines the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome based on the number of attempts.
And the higher the number of bets is, the lower is the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome!
And after 180,900 bets, the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome is 0,4%.
0,5% advertised house edge plus 0,4% maximal possible deviation =
0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge after 180,900 bets!
My experienced house edge 4,6% - 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge =
3,7% ADDITIONAL technically not possible house edge!