The campaign manager is very transparent. It works very well. One of the safety measures taken is to continue to publish the escrow balance every week when the distribution is made to participants. Likewise with the announcement that the escrow funds will be filled every month. If this step continues to be carried out consistently without any obstacles, then there will be no delays in distribution as before.
Yes, but that already happened last time, and having also a pact to go refilling the escrow, suddenly the owner of the casino disappeared again, as he usually does, the manager warned that since that had happened, those who decided to continue wearing the signature that week could remain without payment, at least for a while, and as there was no more news, he stopped the campaign.
In other words, the manager was great, but for the other part it was groundhog day for I don't know how many times already.
I guess we don't have any question on the reputation of the manager since he's well known reputable. What makes everything here questionable is the approach done by the management.
But since they already been questioned and encounter many difficulties and criticism, I have good feeling that they provably do more better these time especially that their reputation will be at stake again. Also they need to provide satisfying performance since there are so many casino exist here now and they provably don't want any controversy will show up that can possibly disturb their operations again.