As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?
Literally speaking, we know that when you are a casino owner, the advantage is greater that you can really get a big profit from the casino. It's just a bit of a hassle because you will need someone to manage your casino business, and of course, you also need to have a lot of capital.
In short, there is a bit of a hassle. While if you are a game owner, there is less hassle, and all you will do is maintain the games, and there is no need for manpower to be paid for,
I just don't know if my understanding of this is correct.
Of course, casino owners do not work alone, generally they must have other workers who are experts in their fields to run their casinos because I think that those who own a casino will not be able to run their own casinos, whether it is a physical casino or an online casino. I think casino owners can indeed get bigger profits, especially if they succeed in running their casinos well with many players who are comfortable gambling in their casinos, it will give them long-term benefits.
By seeing that the game owner does not have other workers besides himself, maybe the profits he gets will purely go into his own pocket, unlike casino owners who have to share it with paying salaries to their workers, comparing these two things is quite difficult, I myself am not sure to confirm it.