You wrote 7+ lines, and none of them were about compound probability, so who reasons better? Me, with logical examples, or you, talking about yourself as if you were a god (who knows everything), with poor and generalized reasoning? You think you're intelligent but end up in absolute embarrassment. I repeat my idea: it's not about skipping keys randomly and that's it. It's simple—I search the most probable places first, understand well, "first." It's not that the keys I skip (momentarily) cannot be explored later, all of this based on compound probability. I see no fault in using probabilities as tools, especially when the search space is enormous. Without wanting to underestimate anything, sequential+random, BSGS, kangaroo, and prefixes, for the current difficulty of the puzzles, are no longer useful unless you have a GPU farm, but that does not discredit the existing algorithms. Or are we now going to talk only about GPU farms for 10 more years? Or at least, since you are the genius, throw us a new idea; maybe it will be you who breaks the paradigms.