Your reply seems as though it is more related to you using the opportunity to promote your services akin to an advert rather than a reply. It is remarkable coincidence you found the post from the complainant in this thread in record timing. As you have mentioned the allegation you have covered that aspect but if coinjoin coordinators are considered high risk and "dirty" liquidity, why not put that information on your website in large bright fonts making unmissable?
We are forced to refute your version of events, we do not need this kind of advertising. You rightly noted that we responded to in this topic very quickly, but this is nothing unusual. We use the BitcoinTalk Super Notifier V2 Telegram bot, so if someone on the forum mentions Quickex, we immediately receive a notification.
Regarding the blocking of funds from coinjoin service - this case is rather an exception, there has not been a single case like this for a long time. We cannot say for sure what exactly the matter is. Perhaps the conjoin service itself has nothing to do with it, and the coins had high risk marks for some other reasons. In any case, our website has all the information about AML, we do not hide anything.