What is your position on this proposal?
IMO the idea of "burning" (some people call it "freezing") is less worse than idea of redistribute Bitcoin from all vulnerable address, which also bring debate on how to perform the redistribution.
I think it would be better if someone from Usa or any other country, with functional QCs comes forward and says we will, break the old or most vulnerable wallets, and not seize, or release the supply back to the market, but will give it back to the right full owner by taking some commission. But it will still dump the btc due to the reasons it was famous will be no more like,
Looking at history, they'll just take it for themselves. Does anyone remember when US government seized BTC-e exchange, where BTC-e user never get their BTC back?