I understand the threat of quantum computing
But following his idea goes against Bitcoin monetary policy
Who decides what a vulnerable coin is?
And the burn option doesn't sit well with me. I believe it should be a last resort and not a plan A.
Yeah the burn idea may discourage quantum attack when implemented on time
But it sacrifices innocent users( even time locked Btc for kids or hires would be lost)
and it doesn't really solve the problem.
What is your position on this proposal?
Too extreme how would the common folk view it
That's it's possible for their coins to be burned by another
Where's the self custody and control in that.
I believe dev should start working now (I'm sure they might have started)
The faster the Better and if it would require migration
People would have the time to move on their own terms ( though some wouldn't since people still use legacy till date. Maybe the burn as punishment to encourage migration)
https://research.ibm.com/projects/quantum-safe-cryptography?utm_source=chatgpt.comCryptography resistance towards quantum computing has already been ongoing since it would be a threat to current world technology.