That is, I am clearing this matter here, suppose an investor invests 100 dollars every week and the market did not change much in those few weeks that he invested consistently but after a few days the market dumped a lot and at that time that investor bought more bitcoins with more money during the market low but he will have a good chance of more profit in the future.
If he has a budget of $100 per week to buy bitcoin, then where is he going to get the extra money? Are you trying to suggest that he actualy has more than $100 per week, but he has been holding back some money in order to buy the dip? Do you believe that he is advantaged by the practice of holding back some of his value, or are you suggesting that there are not any trade offs for the guy who is holding back value to be buying on dips that may or may not end up happening.
I have only mentioned investing $100 per week to make the idea of investing clear. For example, this does not mean that every investor must invest $100 a week. Before talking about investing in bitcoins I have talked about the DCA investment strategy and I have made it clear that in this investment strategy an investor can invest any amount of money at any time. If my post is read by a new investor then he may like the point as stated in the beginning and he may not take seriously the amount I have used to illustrate the case since I am using the following points as an example. Bitcoin is a reliable investment platform to invest in. If it is possible for a person to invest $100 a week, I think he should invest $100.
That is, I am clearing this matter here, suppose an investor invests 100 dollars every week and the market did not change much in those few weeks that he invested consistently but after a few days the market dumped a lot and at that time that investor bought more bitcoins with more money during the market low but he will have a good chance of more profit in the future.
If he has a budget of $100 per week to buy bitcoin, then where is he going to get the extra money? Are you trying to suggest that he actualy has more than $100 per week, but he has been holding back some money in order to buy the dip? Do you believe that he is advantaged by the practice of holding back some of his value, or are you suggesting that there are not any trade offs for the guy who is holding back value to be buying on dips that may or may not end up happening.
There is no problem with the amount changing, basically the investment will depend on an investor's income. If every investor can invest $10 every week then his investment amount at the end of one month is $40 before. And the 10 dollars he invests is not the full amount of his income. Rather, I mean the investor if he is extra serious about his investment then he can consistently invest a portion of his income and set aside some money from the rest of the income so that he can use that money to buy more bitcoins when the opportunity arises.
Now I have mentioned $100 every week and seeing that the investor has to invest $100 this is not the case.