Sorry to say why has this been repeating itself over the time, sincerely if I am not mistakenly this topics and comparison has been raised several times now and yet no meaningful arguments was made from it and yet they still kept repeating this same post and comparison.
Hal finney is not Satoshi nakamoto the better we have peace over the time.
OP, seems to be very knowledgeable about a lot of things he has said here, putting out some facts as a good defence for his claims and like you said, this comparison has came up many times on the forum in different threads, but what I just want to clearly understand is that, after we have finally proven that Hal Finney was Satoshi and now that he is late, what should we do with the discovery? Just curious to know what we are going to do with the discovery after several evidence beyond no doubt has be brought to light to proof the claim, what next?