It gives anyone reading this thread something to confirm for themselves. What you are doing is just going by hunches, the weight of your own ego, and what appears to be the need to be contrarian to anything I have to say.
I'm not going by hunches, there's enough to suggest that Medusah is very likely to be a farmed account. I'll include my rational in another post.
Though lets assume ignorance by all, how would your post saying that the person is not an alt because of their knowledge any different? You also did no research other than comment on their posting style as reason as to why they are not an alt? Is that a real reason? It seems to me more like a cover up, which is why I entered the thread as I did.
Medusah is extremely knowledgeable about Bitcoin and all-things privacy. I don't think they are an alt of the other accounts, which appear to be more generic.
It gives anyone reading this thread something to confirm for themselves. What you are doing is just going by hunches, the weight of your own ego, and what appears to be the need to be contrarian to anything I have to say.
This is why you will never be on DT:
| | BenCodie | | 2025-03-18 | | Reference | | Possible alt account who woke up after the eXch phishing campaign was launched and has previously displayed activities which are in line with account farmers and existing members more than new members since registration. More proof will be collected and posted before being changed to negative. |
The smart thing to do would have been present the evidence first and
then issue a tag. But you rushed this out because of your insatiable need to contradict me.
None of what I said was inaccurate and the rating was not negative. I don't see an issue with my rating and will support it with more information down the line.
This is also not the reason I will not be on DT. I was assured to never be on DT the moment I created a thread that was not in the interest of the groups who benefit and influence the forum most.
I am not surprised to see you ignored this part of my post too:
As for being an asshole to you, you repeatedly go out of your way not to deny your awareness of any existence of corruption of high profile members, which is why you're suspected of being negligent or involved. I welcome you to deny existence:
I have no idea about, have no involvement and am not associated with any group who have negatively impacted the forum/community through negative/unethical actions motivated by profit or by manipulating forum mechanisms.