I'm time poor and to be quite frank have been worried and contemplating the end result.
I would be worried too if I made accusations about forum members and was caught squarely talking out of my asshole.
That's not what I'm worried about. I'm worried about how far the corruption goes and what would happen even with good grounds.
I am not "talking out of my asshole" and if you have some patience you'll see otherwise.
It has only been validated since I began discussing it
Meanwhile, despite your flurry of accusations,
you haven't validated a single thing. Not once. Which is why you are now distrusted by 9 DT members.
This number is not much higher than how distrusted me quite some time ago. It doesn't mean much in any case.
I have said it quite a few times now, that I am creating my threads and when they are posted, they will form basis for speculation surrounding the corruption of high profile members.
I will post, I am just making sure I do not shoot myself in the foot any more than I already have by discussing it prior to posting the thread to begin with.
Good. Even though you'll never admit it, you now see my point about presenting the evidence
before making accusations.
I have already admitted that I do regret posting about what I should have supported with threads first. I am not afraid to admit that.
I don't really understand the relevance of Medusah or blckhwk being alts of each other when the original topic was talking about users who had just woken up to join the campaign:
Its because you didn't actually read and digest information in the OP or this thread in large. You just saw my post and felt compelled to troll me.
That's not true. You had drawn the conclusion that the OP was speaking about the mentioned accounts being alts, though the main focus was that they all woke up to join the campaign. That's how I interpreted it when I got here, and still how I interpret it reading back.
You're welcome to doubt it - I don't see why one would be so convicted with nothing to support their conviction. Anyway, sure we will leave it here and you can have your laugh when the threads are posted.
The only thing I'm "convicted" about is that you rarely have the slightest clue what you're talking about. You just talk and talk about nothing to fulfill your campaign requirement, seldom adding anything of value to any topic you engage.
[/quote]
I was talking about myself - as in, I don't see why I would be so convicted with nothing to support my conviction. I have said many, many times that what I will post about is not a light thing to post about and that it will take time to present it, especially given my already limited time. You are only posting so aggressively now to take advantage of the fact that I am not ready to post...and you can have that while it lasts. I don't mind.
You're welcome to doubt it - I don't see why one would be so convicted with nothing to support their conviction. Anyway, sure we will leave it here and you can have your laugh when the threads are posted.
You just talk and talk about nothing to fulfill your campaign requirement, seldom adding anything of value to any topic you engage.
[/quote]
Aside from these kinds of discussions, I try to provide value in the threads that I contribute to and I'm sure others who see my posts outside of these discussions would agree. I can't agree that I post about nothing nor add any value to any topic I engage, and I think it's fair to say that your opinion is biased.
I will continue responding if prompted, but I suggest ignoring each other until I post the threads I mentioned and continue discussing there. What do you think?