Even the wealthy can't escape their craving for attention, and charity is their most "cost-effective" tool. After all, a donation leads to endless media exposure, and their public image skyrockets. On the other hand, it is precisely because of these celebrity stunts that the public’s focus is drawn to distant social issues.
As true as that might be, you just have to accept that even wealth could be built from public exposure. It’s a technique I’m not very pleased with or doesn’t always sit well with me but, maybe if you look at it from the part of continuity and the fact that, it could cultivate other persons to do good, then the publicity is okay. They get to generate funds from the traction it creates, funds they can redirect back into the charity and it continues to run in a circle.
They do know on how to play the game on which they are really that indeed trying out to benefit into something once they do shell out some funds, and knowing that these billionaires arent that a fool when it comes to investment and business then they would really be trying out to take advantage with it. Just like on what others been saying that not all though will be having this bad intent on using up the poor or who are in need on which there are really those who are really that willingly to help and there are ones who doesnt really love or want to make out some announcement into the charitable works that they've been that doing.