I have called you this as you have made opinions that are not only in line with that behavior but affirm corruption exists in the higher echelons of the forum.
You've only ever affirmed two things: 1) you're an asshole that talks out of your ass, and 2) your reading comprehension sucks.
Sure...
On several occasions, I've welcomed you to deny any involvement or association with corruption in the forum and in return I'd leave you alone until I posted my thread, each time you refuse to deny it or even address the statement.
Again, you are fascinated with the idea that the lack of something is evidence of anything. Its not. And nobody owes you anything.
Denying involvement or association with corruption is not an owing to me, and if it did not exist it would not be such an argument or debate to deny. I'm not fascinated with this idea, it is simply sound logic.
Since we have begun our back and forth when theymos had announced the new forum software would not be released, you and others have refused to deny involvement or association with corruption in the forum.
OK, I'm telling you right now
[1] I've never been involved with any part of "corruption" on this forum. I'm just a forum user like yourself and am entitled to my own opinions.
[2] I don't get special treatment from the admins and have never received any compensation from them.
There's an awful lot of semantics in this this post in my opinion. Instead of simply copy and pasting this sentence:
I have no idea about, have no involvement and am not associated with any group who have negatively impacted the forum/community through negative/unethical actions motivated by profit or by manipulating forum mechanisms.
You decided to craft a completely new one that:
[1] Doesn't deny existence of corruption or that you have any idea about it, just that you have never been involved with any part of "corruption" on this forum.
[2] States that you don't get special treatment from admins, though does not include higher profile members who may manipulate forum mechanisms to yours and/or their benefit.
What you said hasn't wavered my thoughts nor effected anything that I've researched, and I don't believe that it should discredit the notion that corruption exists on the forum. If it was a black and white statement that corruption did not exist or that there are no people or groups who manipulate forum mechanisms, then there'd be no issue with copy and pasting what I had provided. I think we can both agree that no one can make that statement though, right?
Since we have begun our back and forth when theymos had announced the new forum software would not be released, you and others have refused to deny involvement or association with corruption in the forum.
The difference between you and me is I'm respected for the work I do here and you are not.
Seeking a respected members opinion here - what are your thoughts on account farming? Do you consider that a corrupt thing to do, and do you think it should be against the rules? What's your stance?
So going back to the actual topic, where's your big investigation into alts in the campaign thread? Seems like if you have enough time to troll me, you'd have enough time for that. Don't bother replying to this post as I will not be responding; instead use your time to make good on what you said almost an entire week ago:
I'm motivated to find all alts in that thread.
While tiresome in itself, it doesn't take as long to reply to you as it takes longer to audit hundreds of accounts with no automation. There are now over 150 responses there. I've made a start but no one should expect me to be complete given this forum is not my full time priority. It will be done in due time, which is before the 1 month period is over.