and right there. you show your ineptness of research / knowledge.
you just want to throw around buzzwords and emotions.. like zionist and genocide without understanding

and much like i told you in the yemen topic.. the enemy of a opposition (of both sides) usually use places like churches, schools and hospitals to hide their political/military leaders/strategists .. heck they even set up their political/military bases in/near residential cities hoping the opposition wont strike these places by ethical reasons of the purpose of the building/city being that of innocent purpose normally. but soon find out that when they use these sites to hide high level political/military leaders or the site is used as a launch area of rockets.. that site becomes a target even if it is a school, hospital, or church

in short by the political/military leaders using a location to hide like cowards due to alot of innocents being nearby (used as collateral), they are using innocents as the cannon fodder/shields.

so when the site is hit. it should be known the place was targeted because of the political/military hiding out in it like cowards and using innocent people as shields

---

.. my opinion on the war and who is involved or shouldnt be
trump/america and keir/uk should stay out of the fight.. leave it for the jew/muslims to fight over who should own the land. and only their neighbours help out the sides that they side with

as for those in the warzone
take it out the cities.. stop hiding like cowards by using innocent people as collateral hoping strikes wont happen due to collateral risk.. instead, if you want to fight over land, religion or whatever..  take it to the empty fields of the borders

and yes that means for all countries, EG UK parliament for instance, which is an obvious political stronghold target should enemies want to start war against the UK.. should not be in the center of london.. yes its there to hide amongst the innocent people of london and the hope is that the amount of collateral risk surrounding parliament safeguards the politicians from attack. but if there was war sparked by the UK parliament. those politicians should get out of london and fight at the borders and not hide like cowards hoping attacks wont happen in cities due to the collateral risk(being used as shields), but can end up being used as cannon fodder

EG.. WW2
if the politicians left london and moved to the countryside or if parliament was simply never built in london. and politicians/military didnt hide in amongst innocent residents.. no bombs would have hit london. they would have hit parliament in the countryside
emphasis instead of getting the women and children to evacuate london to the countryside.. less bombs would have hit london innocents during the blitz if military targets were not hiding in cities
...
now do you understand why your houthi rebels hid in their governorates set up in residential cities. instead of setting up/standing on the front line of borders/open land ..
by hiding amongst the innocents put neighbouring innocents of governorates at risk via collateral damage.. is a cowards strategy of hoping to not get struck(by using innocents as shields)

..
and yes i do wish if those shooting missiles at government/military targets, actually did have the precision missiles they claim to have.. so that any political/military target is the only thing hit with no excess blast zone of hitting innocent neighbours(causing collateral damage)