It is very unfair if you compare Man United with Chelsea this season.
I will not defend anyone but look at this,
- Enzo Maresca joined Chelsea and was able to recruit the players he wanted. Now the coach can bring Chelsea with a good appearance. That makes sense.
- While Amorim joined Man United after Ten Hag was fired. And Amorim has not brought in the players he wanted. So there is no other choice but to maintain the squad that has been compiled by the previous coach. This is clearly unfair.
In conclusion, the best result that Chelsea has achieved so far has become part of the coach's plan that is able to fight with his chosen players. And Amorim is only able to survive by rotating players perfectly to try his best in other competitions with the existing line up.
Are we arguing which coach is better or which team has been better this season. If we are arguing which team has been better then clearly it is Chelsea who have been the better team this season, they have a chance at finishing in top four at the end of the season if they can win more games from the remaining games left to play.
We could deduce both of those at the same time. Enzo looks to be a better manager this season, we do not know what is going to happen next season neither, but Amorim failed so far, we should definitely give him some time before we judge him, but that doesn't mean we can't compare him, and Enzio is miles better than Amorim at the moment.
And if we compare the teams... well we do not even have to compare the teams because United sucked all season long, they are worse than half of the league already, and comparing them to Chelsea makes no sense. If we could consider this to be a very specific situation, then we can't really see how this could be sensitive, we need to realize this is quite normal for Chelsea to be considered better.