Yeah. This is obviously what will happen.
However, I am still worried that if all this is implemented, then it will be impossible for anonymous gamblers to simply play for their own pleasure. By the way, the number of players will decrease somewhat on a global scale, since anonymity is important for some players and, for various reasons, they simply cannot provide their personal data to the casino and pass KYC. It seems that decentralized casino options will not be able to save the situation either, although it is obvious to everyone that anonymous casino play is a very popular service and millions of players prefer to play this way.
I think they have considered it too so they do not hesitate to implement this rule, so we do not have to worry about it. Apart from that, even though the casino requires KYC we can still see many users coming and I do not even see users decreasing significantly because of this rule. Actually if we look at the journey, then I think it will be the same in the future, meaning even though at the beginning the casino did not require KYC, then in the future we do not know what changes they will make.
It doesn't really matter if they implement this rule as long as they can maintain the trust of users. And don't forget they also build trust not only in a short time, so I don't think they will destroy what they have built for years, yes even though the risk is still there.