Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Airdropped legendary vs self-made legendary...
by
apogio
on 03/04/2025, 08:21:59 UTC
This is exactly what I wanted to say. There are many talented people on the forum, but there are also those who, due to the number of alternatives, write nonsense or repeat the same thing from topic to topic, simply rearranging the words. I will not list all those from whom I see an exchange of merits; it looks very template. People rate posts that others find not only empty, but also difficult to read. From here we see high ranks, publishing nonsense, but despite this, are evaluated by the same as they are.

For example:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=663136
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=667920
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=662950
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=815243

I think it's pretty hard not to notice the unique posting style, which is very similar to those who rate the same posts.

Yes, it is. Do you think / assume / have evidence that there is also payment-based merit sending? Like users paying others for earning merits.
I don't understand why these users exchange merits though. If I could (for instance) buy 10,000 merits and be a shitposter, would anyone look at me as a serious user? Would I be able to be a campaign member? I am sure not.