Perhaps I wasn't very specific. Active means that they're still active on the forum, having a latest post history within the past 30 days. That doesn't necessarily mean that they're still using AI, but they are users who have been reported at least once and the report was accurate. It doesn't mean that they're still using AI, I want to clear this misunderstanding. This is the reason why I've added links to their profiles, so anyone can easily click on the user and see for themselves if they're still suspicious or not.
With a glance, some profiles still show signs of AI usage, but I haven't gone through to check, it's just that some posts stand out without requiring me to go through a detector.
Also, I personally not going to report someone who's giving me mixed results. I'll first check, do their posts look suspicious? If yes, proceed to the next step, start scanning them. If I can't produce satisfactory results (for instance 4 out of 5 detectors showing that they're AI written) they go to my watch list so I can check again in the future. In the meantime, I'll check older posts to see if there's a difference in their writing style and pattern.
Yes, thank you. I understood you correctly, and you wrote everything correctly. I wanted to know if there will be repeated uses of AI; what can these users with an existing tag expect?