can we all realise mBTC and uBTC are not FUTURE PROOFING.. they are just temporary. we need to think about FUTURE-PROOFING
so please get with the program.. the mbtc and ubtc arguments are futile and repeated to death, move on and evolve passed the old stuff and think of the future..
so lets think about RELEVANT names for 100sat's that have NOT been used, but show some relevance to bitcoin ecosystem
Wait - µBTC
is 100 Satoshi (I guess really I should say 100 Satoshi is 1 µBTC, since we started with BTC and Satoshi came later). So if µBTC isn't future-proof, then new-name-for-100-satoshi won't be either, surely?