Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Buy the DIP, and HODL!
by
JayJuanGee
on 05/04/2025, 18:24:08 UTC
Investors certainly target profits in investing, so it's no wonder that we see them managing purchases quite well by using the DCA strategy. Indeed, many of us see at a glance that bitcoin investment is a very easy investment because we only need to buy and hold, but if there is no good stance I think many mistakes can be made.

When we start something, we need a strong stance to achieve success by making a profit. The long road certainly has many obstacles, of course we need a lot of preparation, including managing time well and allocating a budget to buy bitcoin.

If we look at the price of bitcoin, where in early 2025 bitcoin reached its highest peak, of course we see a lot of interest from novice investors who continue to buy bitcoin, and today we see the price correcting again which creates an opportunity to continue to accumulate bitcoin at a low price.

You are likely correct that there is a certain amount of focus on the level of profits, and perhaps in the first several years of investing, profits might be a tangible way of attempting to measure progress in the bitcoin holdings, yet it also seems to me that the more time that passes, profits are likely going to become more of a side interest rather than a central area of interest, since one of the most important measures become whether you have enough BTC and how to valuate your bitcoin to figure out if you have enough or not. 

Surely, the more that your bitcoin is in profits, then you might feel that you have been able to get advantages from that, even though the greater punchline might be two question whether your bitcoin holdings can be valuated at 2x your annual expenses, or 5x, or 10x, or 15x or some other number and surely I start to consider that any of us should be able to live off of our bitcoin once it reaches 10x our annual expenses using the 200-WMA.   For me, I am anticipating that the bitcoin holdings would be in profits, yet the amount of profits are not as important as compared to what is the overall valuation of the holdings in light of the 200-WMA.