BadBear, we obviously have a different opinion on signature campaigns but I'm perfectly fine with that. I won't go far supporting my opinion and I also appreciate that you're here explaining what is happening and giving us some insight. But honestly, what's to earn out of giving people the impression there is a "risk to get banned"? A handful of people probably already got banned. And this happens while a nother handfull of people is having a daily three digit post count. Do you think that the ones that got banned are going to come back and never spam again in fear of not getting banned again? According to my humble opinion again you should At least let them know why they got baned in more detail. Let them know specifically what post of them was it that you didn't like. Don't just press the "ban button" without getting into the effort to explain why the user got banned. This is going to prevent people from being repeat offenders and also help make the situation more clear. You should do this anyway if you don't want people to come back at you complaining for an unfair ban.

Because to me, it seems normal to get complains if accounts get banned without any previous warning. (And no I don't think the posts you made as warnings are proper for this situation, it's so easy to miss one post out of thousands no matter how ipmportant it is.)