You are right. It is very complex, and the goals proposed in the preprint are ambitious. On the other hand, such a project seems necessary. Technology has evolved significantly in the 15 years since Bitcoin’s inception, and I’ve often wondered how Satoshi would design it today. No question—my love and respect for Bitcoin will always remain unwavering. At the same time, the early development creates inherent limitations. For example, it will be challenging to achieve a fair transition to a quantum-resistant network (https://blog.lopp.net/against-quantum-recovery-of-bitcoin/). I also think pure peer-to-peer is no longer unique. The next technological battle will take place at the intersection of privacy and authenticity (DID).

I’m pleased to have found a fellow supporter, and it would make me even happier if more people joined us. My proposal in the preprint requires many talents in cryptography and programming. Additionally, a communication infrastructure for the community still needs to be established. I intentionally did not take on this task myself, as I hold high standards for Zensia as a purely community-driven project. My role should remain that of a normal contributor.