In fact, Bram's proof-of-work confirms the prefix theory, but they behave like stubborn children.
It does not.
Also
There is no formal math proof that this prefix theory works.
There is not a large enough empirical example that this prefix theory works. Even on the full set of proofs for BTC67, this does not apply.
There are all the statistics in the world, along with all the people who know anything about math on this forum, including
people doing this as their day job for 20 years, who tell you
it does not work the way you think it does.
Dont make me write a formal math proof you wont be able to read anyway, please.
Take it easy; this isn't a debate between a Christian and an atheist. The atheist theorizes that God doesn't exist but cannot prove it, and vice versa. Creating a pool doesn't make you Fermat or Pascal. You know that you can't 100% refute something without evidence. Therefore, you conjecture, and I conjecture, both of us are right and wrong at the same time. However, it is a mathematical error to assert things you haven't firmly investigated.