This problem highlights and illustrates the point that I was trying to make in the previous post: 1 developer cannot handle all of the problems that come up with a coin, no matter how good they are. Being anonymous makes it too tempting to quit to escape the pressure. I think that we need at least 3 full-time developers who are fully committed to UNO. 5 would be ideal. At least 2 of the 5 should be non-anonymous to give people confidence that UNO will be supported, and will not disappear like Noirbits did.
I personally think that we are just spinning our wheels until we solve this fundamental problem. I think that our main focus should be on:
- Having a fully committed core development team [NOT DONE].
- Having a good-looking website [DONE] that is constantly maintained up-to-date [NOT DONE], making the latest source AND binary versions of the UNO client available for download: Windows, Mac, Linux, and Android [NOT DONE].
- Have a good-looking block explorer [DONE] that is reliable, and kept running properly 99.999% of the time [NOT DONE].
a dev-team of at least 3 would be good at this point. There is a lot of work to be done.
As you know my friend I'm very committed to this and this statement comes out as if you do not have faith in my work and in direction tone of not appreciating my time and effort I'm putting towards UNO and all what I have and will be doing and devalues everything I've committed towards UNO.
This is a way to tell me not to further engage in UNO developments?
Please elaborate.
~SoopY~
Soopy, don't feel discouraged. You are doing FANTASTIC work! We are just going through the natural growing pains that any coin goes through. Just take what I have said, and think about it.