As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
In my case I think I would prefer to be a casino owner. In both cases you have the math in your favor, but you are only going to make a profit if you get enough people to come to your casino, or play your game. I think I would rather control everything from one casino than having to sell my game in many different casinos. But it all comes down to your profit. If in that hypothetical situation I would make more profit being a game owner than being a casino owner I would prefer the former.
Being a casino owner has a smaller risk and benefits from the many games provided while creating a game is more difficult than imagined and the risk is high, we must try to make the game more profitable for the dealer because that is how the game maker gets profit besides that in gambling there are parties who cheat while the game owner is the one who bears the loss while as a casino owner it doesn't matter whether the game is cheated or not the most important thing is getting a commission from the game owner, So in this case I would also prefer to be a casino owner rather than making games.