You are phrasing aggressiveness in ambiguous and even confusing ways BitBakerr1.

Aggessiveness is not an absolute, but instead it is relative to ones own circumstances, and frequently, we might objectively proclaim that investing less than 5% of one's income is whimpy and investing more than 30% is aggressive, however from person to person, there could be situations in which 5% is aggressive and 30% is whimpy, and so therefore it is not completely accurate to merely proclaim that another person is being aggressive or not aggressive merely based on the quantity of bitcoin that he is buying from his overall income ... so in that sense aggressiveness is relatively, yet it is probably also more accurately assessed based on discretionary income, including accounting for some folks potentially having more variance in their discretionary income as compared with other folks.

From my perspective the person who is investing as aggressive as he is able to accomplish without going overboard is likely going to be monitoring the extent to which his discretionary income might change every week and he is adapting to figure out how aggressive he is able to be and being aggressive within his assessment of how aggressive he is able to be.

Surely there can be a quite a bit of variance in the judgement of individuals, and they might even want to vary the level of aggressiveness, and their might be some weeks that they might want to invest 90% or more of their discretionary income into bitcoin, and their may be other weeks that they might purposefully choose to invest less than 40% of their deiscretionary incoime into bitcoin, and surely their changes in their level of aggressiveness might be based on good reasons or maybe based on not so good reasons, but surely each person is in a position to make these kinds of judgements about how aggressive that they might want to be and what kinds of priorities that they have, and from time to time how their priorities might change.  

A hypothetical person with a $30k income (so $2,500 per month), and with $1,500 to $1,900 of expenses per month), who had been investing into bitcoin fairly aggressively for 2 years or more, (let's say between $50 and $200 per week depending on his cashflows for each of the weeks).  Maybe this guy had ended up investing into bitcoin around an average per week of $140, which added up to $14,700 invested and about 0.322 BTC.. So he is pretty happy with his results and he thinks that he has around 7-10 years more of investing into bitcoin before he might get to a position that he feels that he has enough bitcoin or more than enough bitcoin.

This guy might decide to take a 10-week break from investing into bitcoin, and so then maybe he decides that he will just invest $30 per week into bitcoin for those next 10 weeks, and he tries to save as much as he can between $20 and $170 per week to put into his reserves so that he can hopefully get up to $1,000 saved up so that he can go on a trip or to take his signifiant other to go on a trip.  He does this on purpose, and he knows that he is sacrificing his bitcoin investment for 10 weeks and ONLY investing a bare minimum for 10 weeks, yet he is pretty sure that his going on the $1k trip will help his relationship with his significant other, and it will be valuable for his further life with the other person.  

So maybe we can proclaim that this hypothetical guy lightened up on his bitcoin investment aggressiveness, or we might say that he continued to be as aggressive as he could be in light of some new priorities that he had that would take right around 10 weeks to carry out.  

Surely, he might be able to time his 10 week savings, yet sometimes the nature of relationships might not necessarily give him a lot of luxury in terms of how well he might be able to time his "saving up for the trip" period.  

We surely can come to differing judgements about priorities, and sometimes we will be faced with dilemmas in regards to what to do, or how to go about accomplishing the balancing of our various priorities while still potentially attempting to be as aggressive as we believe that we are able to be in regards to our bitcoin investment practices.