They do, it's there, specified in the opening post, where OP "quoted" their email, which OP later provide the screenshot for [
#19],
"
Your betting behaviour was flagged as suspicious by our Sportsbook provider and upon further investigation of both your account and betting activities with our Sportsbook provider, it was determined that you have breached our Terms and Conditions."
that's just a statement, it's not really proof of anything.
what i mean is actual evidence, things like betting history and a detailed report or something like that.
Kinda beating the dead horse, IMO, given OP slipped and admitted that he's a prolific abuser [long-time arb-er/value bettor, accessing through several emails and IPs and wallet to avoid detection]. But if that's what needed to amicably mark this case as resolved, then I guess we wait.
it is beating a dead horse, but a ruling from AG would put it to rest.