The problem was the reason behind that exhaustive steps in signing up into casinos: to avoid being detected and limited. OP fully knows that he already had a prior situation with providers, and thus complaining when several casinos take actions against his account under the direction of Betby, rather... like being suprised when he burned his hand because he played with fire. Or get wet when he played in a pond.
I will have to disagree on this one, I will respect your opinion because you are one of the only helpful members here.
I don't think he needs to be taking those steps to sign up of course, but I don't think it should be a reason to punish a customer if they are not multi-accounting.
I personally have used like 25 betby providers under my IP, wallet and email and had no issues, but did research on any open scam reports before depositing.
So I have had no issues with playing on multi betbys and I don't think betby will be telling betpanda they should take customers funds. If they did then why did the other 24 betbys I played at pay out no problem?
The main issue to focus on is just Betpanda's values as a whole, they are a complete outlier in the betby provider space.
They are one of the only sites constantly consficating funds from winners, and my example of valuebetting above still stands.
It's crazy for them to say it isn't allowed, how do you determine whether a bet was value or not? Even if a bet wins it doesn't mean its a profitable bet.
Customers should be insanely worried about placing bets here.
You are good with all of your 25 accounts because none are from the same casino, thus not multi-acc, and most importantly, you're probably doesn't have a prior with the provider. The OP though, arbing at one point, and I am quite sure they have the record of it. Thus, you can't compare your situation with his. It's like going through the airport where your name is not on the watchlist, while he has an interpol-issued warrant.