You’re confusing empirical testing and formal proof.
We already explained a million times why, formally, the prefix theory would break 3 different mathematical constructs if true. That’s the scientific method. Do you need me to go over it again ?
We do not need to conduct empirical testing because of that. But it you want to, you can use my 67 proofs to do so, which will also disprove the prefix theory.
Bram,
Nobody says they broke 3 different mathematical structures. There is definitely no one who claims to have done such a thing.
In my work, I can calculate on the first prefixes 10 and 11. My studies on 12 or 13 are still ongoing.
Example;
You entered a very large neighborhood. There are 10,000 doors. You are looking for someone named John. But you don't know his address. There are 50 Johns in total. When you knock on a few doors, you ask for John. When you go to the first John, it is not John you are looking for. He tells you the street of the other John but he doesn't know the building number.
Now would you knock on 10,000 doors one by one?
Would you ask the Johns and try to find the real John?
I repeat. Nobody here says that you can find the location of John's house. (Sha256, H160, Base58.. He does not say that he broke such mathematics.)