Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
so you were going to prove that I was wrong, someday?
The arrogance is astounding.
You probably have to chage 20 or so lines of code to accomodate the script to your theory and run it by yourself, but you wont.
If this does not change your mind, nothing will and I wish you all the best.
20 lines, lol, I just want to make it clear that you shouldn't criticize without knowing. I don't criticize anyone's ideas here, so why would you come and criticize mine? If it's 20 lines, why didn't you do it? That was your main purpose, wasn't it?
I did not do it because it will never be good enough to convince you. I realize that now.
If it shows no improvement over random, you'll say it's because its numbers and not private keys..
if I change it to be private keys and your method, you'll find another way to dismiss it, and so on.
To be honest I'm quite sure you didn't bother reading it or running it. So well, you win this argument
Enjoy !You have just exposed yourself. First, it makes no sense with any of the methods discussed here. Second, where are the hashes in your test? You skipped the fundamental part of the theories here: uniform distribution of the hashes. Without hashes, there is no uniform distribution, so your script is meaningless. Lol.