He is not. They are not accusing him of multi-accounting too, if you bother to read this thread carefully [I guess you just jumped from the opening post and to the last page].
The problem was that OP caught by the provider of arbing, and he admitted that. Due to this being on their record in the past, be it in five or six years or one month ago, the mark followed him everywhere, across platforms. That's why he need to take several counter-measure [and failed] to stall Betby [through the casino] to recognize his fingerprints.
The problem here is not a multi-acc, nor the creation of accounts with different email addresses and wallets. The problem is the reason why OP need to create accounts with different email addresses.
They did not catch him arbing because it's literally not possible, you need two different books to arb. They do not have access to his other bets if he arbed.
So they are banning him for value bets which is even more insane, as I explained above.
He doesn't need to create accounts with different email addresses, he is taking a useless precaution, I genuinely have no idea why he is doing that.
He is doing nothing wrong on 99% of betting sites, betpanda is the 1% that will take funds for placing +ev positions.
Stop defending this casino, they are clearly in the wrong.
I don't think you are educated enough in sportbetting to realise why having arbing in the terms of service makes NO sense.
They cannot ever catch anyone arbing because it requires two oddsets, betby is just one set of odds, you cannot arb it off for profit on just betby alone.
If you believe valuebetting is still covered in their t&c and they are entitled to consficate funds from people doing so, then I have no words, I have lost hope in this site.
Nope, they don't need two different providers for that. Two different casinos, yes, quite likely. Two different providers? No. One provider that facilitate casinos with sportsbetting is enough. They can collect the data of the bets, as basically all data are being analyzed by them. And OP, apparently, played in tons of casinos. How small is the margin that amongst those casinos, two or three or four of them are with Betby?
Not to mention --suppose the detection is not found by the provider, but the casino themselves-- there are easy telltale of arbing, I've explained exhaustively in the past. Feel free to look for it in my post history.
Bottom line is, he got limited due to utilizing prohibited strategy in the past. He got caught. This is the clincher. He was marked by Betby, hence the precaution. The flag raised into his person followed him to his grave.
He incriminate himself in those posts I gave you for reference, and the situation should be very obvious just from that two. Have you read them? If you haven't, please do.
And no, I am not "defending" this casino although "they are [not] wrong". I am "defending" this casino because the player is the abusive one. I am simply defending the victim, as alwayas. In this case, the victim is the casino.
On the other thread about this same casino, I am trying to get a hold of this very same casino's contact so I can get one of the player of
this casino what should be theirs.