How could I take them seriously and make a proposal on equal terms in the pursuit of truth if I receive childish responses?
I don’t have as much time as you do; I work, and I don’t have a PC that can run quick tests.
I don’t want to waste time making scripts that won’t provide anything beyond childish things.
I never heard you thanking Bram for taking from his own time to even test your theory, even if it is not to your taste for various reasons.
You talk about scientific methods and so on, but you can't even test your own theories (let alone prove them), however you are so sure that they are working and are fail-safe, to the point of comparing yourself to the greatest minds in history vs clueless peasants. You know, all the guys with PhDs and so on, who refuted the Monty Python issue, they all later apologized, after being shown the proof of truth. In this case (you vs whomever), even after having all the proofs contrary to what you believe, the proofs will never ever suffice to make you even consider the fact that you might, at the end of the day, be wrong.
So, it's understandable why you don't want to waste time writing scripts. After all, you very well know that if what you suggest is true, it would mean cryptography is broken. Thank you for not wanting to prove us that cryptography is broken.