If a person can't be convinced of Bitcoin as a "Safe Haven", even with a zoomed out perspective, then they could probably be convinced of it as a "bet" against the current financial system, AND as I have posted yesterday, a bet that the Federal Reserve/Central Banks around the globe will print more money.
The question for YOU now is, what's the probability that the Federal Reserve and other Central Banks won't print more money? The answer is - ZERO probability.
What do you think is a safe haven and what are the criteria to be considered a safe haven?
For me, a safe haven should be an asset that is stable and most importantly, not subject to dumping during times of economic uncertainty and recession. Its goal is to protect our assets from both short-term and long-term losses or even increases during times of crisis.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin has decentralization, limited supply, long-term growth...these factors are suitable to become a safe haven. But is it stable and growing or is it constantly being dumped during economic turmoil? Not to mention, an asset that only increases in price based on positive news and will be dumped when there is negative news or even unverified fake news. How can it be called a safe haven?
It would be incorrect to say that bitcoin will never be a safe haven because that may change over time. But right now, it doesn't meet the criteria and is not a safe haven.