No magic here — all the scripts made by you, me, and others only prove that all the methods are equivalent. As the number of total checks are the same.

I specifically made you a Python script, with no prefixes, no hashes, just to show how easy it is to introduce a bias in the number of wins and that what matters is the total number of checks. Or do you seriously think that counting from 1 to 20 first and then from 50 to 21 somehow increases your chances of finding a uniform random number?

And on top of that, having your method search using random prefixes doesn’t change the result. Have you asked yourself why?

Honestly, I don’t know how to make it any more basic than this — but maybe you’re just a troll and should simply be agreed with. I will give up