No one would not like to invest Aggressively. Aggressive investment is a good idea but most times you understand that the more compound wealth you put in a place at once, the harder it would be for you to ignore it for a long time. One aspect of aggressive investment is that you are glued to the chart and especially your anxiety rises mostly for newbies.
Really? Then what do some of the big influencers like Saylor and other maximalists do with the same thing where their strategy is aggressive.
It's not that we don't want to, it's that we can't afford to take the risks that will occur later due to the economic constraints that we have that make us have to rethink about investing aggressively. If we had enough resources financially then surely most of us would do the same thing but we need to live and support our daily needs so we need to think several times if we have to sacrifice something important for aggressive investment and we certainly cannot take such risks.
So in this case when we don't invest aggressively it doesn't mean we don't want to but we think about whether it is effective or we can do it or not. If we think it's too risky then we will definitely take alternatives with other purchases such as DCA or buy dips but if in the end we have enough resources and we can withstand all the risks because our economy can still withstand it then I think we will do the same thing by trying to invest aggressively because the returns will definitely also be much greater according to the size of the portopolio that we have.