I'm certain that the only exact comparison method is for both to follow the same path... but he simply avoids doing so to deceive—a "fool hunter".
Your certainty is a plain-out total non-sense. The Scooby Doo method does not give a shit on how other methods work. This was the main poiin to be proven, and it succeeded 100% - for anyone who isn't blind.
Your method, on the other hand, is 100% dependent on how the other method works. Which, again, for anyone who isn't a total retard, is the main reason why it wins more - because this is how it's built to, by design.
The prefix search has sparked quite a lot of discussion in recent months, and I admit—that was my goal from the start.
Great. You managed to reach your goal - having the prefix method totally dismissed as having any sort of advantage whatsoever.
However, some people crave the spotlight and refuse to accept mathematics for what they are. I’ve had a lot of fun with this, truly, but at this point, I find the meaningless debates here rather dull.
Why are you insisting with this? It was proven to you countless times, again and again, that it has no benefits. So why are you pushing it again and again?
As you can see, all the scripts shared here intending to discredit the use of prefixes have actually served as practice for me and as examples. Even though their initial purpose was far from supporting me, they indirectly strengthened my theory, and now I have several practical cases to use as examples—proving my point.
Keep the practices to yourself maybe. The prefix method does not work. This is what the countless scripts and evidences and facts and proofs brought up as a conclusion.
Since all their failed attempts to discredit the prefix technique have only led me to refine the method by incorporating prefixes into their own ideas, it’s clear I have demonstrated far more than I intended. The undeniable fact remains: prefix-based brute force methods are versatile and adaptable to any idea or strategy, improving them 100% of the time.
So 100% valid proofs are now "failed attempts". Cool.

So, now that there is ample proof, I won’t be integrating prefixes into their future theories or implementations—I’ve grown tired of it.
Their repeated and unsuccessful efforts to sideline me have only reinforced my stance. By integrating probabilistic prefix usage, I’ve definitively shown that it is superior.
No, all attempts were succesfull. Your idea does not work and yields no advantages. Why do you keep trolling the complete contrary?
Final conclusion of my research:
All linear brute force methods can be improved by incorporating probabilistic search using prefixes.
Therefore, I strongly recommend applying this approach to any brute force implementation involving hashes.
If you don’t find the idea appealing or can’t grasp it yet, I suggest simply adding prefix-based logic to any concept or strategy you have—and you’ll witness the magic in action.
The only magic to witness is that it doesn't work any better than simply iterating over the keys, in any order you like. Or simply picking random unpicked keys, whichever you like. Or simply picking up some random number, checking if it's some whatever value, with the same EXACT chances as what the prefix method does, and witnessing the EXACT same results.
Please stop pushing this non-sense and list of total lies further. You are posting stuff that newbies would actually believe as being true even 0.01%. This isn't the case and you have all the evidences right under your nose.
Everyone: The Scooby Doo methods work just as better as the prefix method does. Just check out the results for yourselves. Do not listen to trolls, use your brains.