funny, you establish that the regulator is always bad and does only adverse things...
This is not quite
true, but any regulator primarily pursues its own interests, not the interests of the majority of the population of its country. Thus, their actions don't always lead to positive changes in the lives of users. In this case, there was a convenient and high-quality service, and now they are forced to close this platform. Has this made it better for users? The answer is obvious.
As the large corporations try to monetize the internet at scale, they will destroy everything that makes it great and replace it with terrible stuff that nobody asked for.
And the worst thing is that the users are fine with it because they barely know how to use computers anyway. Nowadays they are all on their phones using the same 5 social media apps.
Yes, I agree.
Mass character absorbs and destroys
individuality (projects). The worst thing is that the stronger corporations become, the less resistance such small platforms can offer.
Leviathan sweeping away everything in its path.
The PC/Laptop era is drawing to a close. The mobile era is winning. It is much easier and simpler to poke a finger at the screen.