No one would not like to invest Aggressively. Aggressive investment is a good idea but most times you understand that the more compound wealth you put in a place at once, the harder it would be for you to ignore it for a long time. One aspect of aggressive investment is that you are glued to the chart and especially your anxiety rises mostly for newbies.
When you are doing a thing aggressively, you have more chance of doing it wrongly and emotionally. Doing things wisely and cleverly but gradually with time is a safer road to success.Learning, investment, trading, whatever things in practice, don't do it in hurry and when you do it aggressively, you can ignore many things, risk warnings and also enough cooling time for your own assessment over time. Nothing can be executed perfectly so a break time for own assessment for adjusting your plan and method is very necessary or even vital for your success.
Remember that it plays important role to protect your initial capital, that means most for investors. If you can protect your initial capital, you are doing well and you will always have many opportunities to get profit in this market. Aggressively chasing profit can likely lead to loss eventually.
Many guys seem to be associating "aggressive" investing as if it were employing unnecessary risk, and personally, I think that they are misunderstanding the word as a descriptor.
As other guys said, it is likely that any guys who merely invest into bitcoin consistently, persistently, ongoingly and regularly, they will still be advantaged by their bitcoin investment, even if they do not invest aggressively... .. and even historically, we have seen that guys who got off zero and bought into bitcoin have been considerably advantaged by their getting into bitcoin as compared with folks who had not, especially if they errored on the side of ongoing bitcoin accumulation through buying and not devolving into trading or selling any of their bitcoin (except maybe spend and replace practices).
I think that it is true that relatively speaking a person who chooses to be more aggressive in his bitcoin investing will have to have better organization skills and practices in regards to his cashflow management as compared with someone who chooses to be less aggressive in his bitcoin investing. These are choices that people make about their priorities, and frequently, I consider the level of aggressiveness in buying bitcoin as a way of describing priorities towards bitcoin rather than presuming that the employment of aggressive bitcoin accumulation practices unnecessarily includes an entering into additional and unnecessary risks.
Of course, not everyone considers bitcoin accumulation as a priority in their lives (and that is a choice), and they are balancing other priorities that they have, which are choices that people make, and surely some bitcoin accumulators might be in relations with other people in which they are not able to be as aggressive in their bitcoin accumulation practices based on their sharing financial decision-making with such other person(s) who may well not prioritize bitcoin as much.
And yeah bitcoin is volatile and it is not guaranteed to go up, yet it seems that at the same time it is amongst the best of places (if not the best of places) to be putting value for a large number of people around the world in terms of whatever that they are able to save up for a couple of cycles or longer.. then it is likely that their purchasing power is going to be better preserved by keeping the value in bitcoin as compared with any other place that it can be kept.
Of course nothing is guaranteed yet bitcoin is much more compared to every other asset, looking at the past of bitcoin and how well it has performed there is no much asset that is better than bitcoin for a long term investment even though there are other forms of investment that might be profitable yet bitcoin seems to be out performing them. Bitcoin as a store of value is one of the most underrated by low coiners or no coiners for the mere fact that it's volatile whereas it's volatile nature is one of the most adorable features that it has as it creates more opportunities for one to buy at a cheaper price. Volatility seems to scare a lot of folks away from investing into bitcoin, and at the same time, many no coiners and/or low coiners look at bitcoin's historical price performance and they consider that it has gone up too much in the past to be able to justify putting money into it with an expectation that bitcoin will continue to go up in the future. No one wants to be the sucker who buys into something at or near the top, and so their lack of understanding bitcoin ends up contributing to their ongoing fear of getting into it... and yeah, maybe many of us would speculate that lack of understanding should motivate performing more researching into bitcoin, which surely takes time and also abilities to sort out the good sources of information from the bad sources of information, and there are a lot of bad sources of information out there in the real world.
[edited out]
Indeed bitcoin has out performed every other project including shitcoins. Etheruem which is known as the king of altcoins/shitprojects is gonna be a decade old by July yet it's price value is nothing compared to the price of Bitcoin when it was a decade old. There are several factors proving that there are no second best when it comes to bitcoin so I wonder why people think of diversifing their investment if not for the sake of gambling. It's true nothing is guaranteed yet people still have fortune invested in bitcoin and they still make profit from every bullish season. I know it sounds a bit strange but I can't give up my accumulation because profits aren't guaranteed, life itself is presented without bunch of choices which are all risky, it's left for you to pick which of the risk you're willing to take to make a difference.Frequently folks diversify for the sake of trying to cover their bases when they feel that the do not sufficiently understand the asset class. So they diversify out of ignorance and just trying to make sure that they are covered.
Warren Buffet has a quot with similar ideas:
Diversification of your investments into shitcoins in this era is a waste of energy. Most shitcoins don't even survive few hours stake and you're already running at loss. When you are rightly informed, your attitude towards bitcoin and shitcoins would be clearly established. Anyone who seeks knowledge before investing would understand that it's only bitcoin that should be trusted no matter how the market behaviour looks like today. A limited asset would never run to dust at any point even after exhaustion of the total possible coins. If it's not bitcoin, it's real estate and that's the proper plan in this Morden world where wealth is sacrosanct.
Not only a waste of energy but also resources knowing that lots of shitcoins right now is just a pure scam. That's why they better avoid thinking about diversifying their investment on shitcoins because for sure they won't get any sustainable profits with that tokens especially that everything there is unstable.
If we look at the situation and performance for many years Bitcoin is the only consistent coin that shows positive growth. Many promise about they go the same as Bitcoin but for many times they just fool their investors and scammed them. So better focus on Bitcoin only if they aim for long term and don't let their selves get fooled around by fake promises which might end them up getting scammed.
When talking of real diversification, we should be talking about diversifying into real estate, gold stock's, etc not alt or meme coin.
Part of the problem of diversification into shitcoins is that they are nearly completely correlated to the performance of bitcoin, which means that they depend on the success of bitcoin for them to be successful... and mostly in the investment talks, many of us will consider diversification to attempt to put value into assets that are not necessarily correlated, which is part of the rationale of picking differing sectors in order to attempt to achieve some semblance of diversification.. so yeah, properties, equities, commodities, bonds, cash/cash equivalents and/or maybe even investing in a business in which you are leveraging your labor.
There are possibilities that some shitcoins will outperform bitcoin in short spurts and maybe even longer time frames, yet it seems scary to be investing into shitcoins when an overwhelming majority of them seem to be scammy in their proclamations, and anyone investing into shitcoins should keep in mind that they are more likely trading rather than investing, so they likely need to figure out their entry and exit plans in regards to various shitcoins and they also likely should be limiting their exposure to shitcoins to be no more than 10% of the value that they put into bitcoin.. or some other fair way off assessing and/or limiting exposure to shitcoins without cheating by continuing to put value into them when they are likely going to end up losing money, relative to bitcoin.