Why don't we stay out of the ban appeals and shit like that as the mods know what they are doing. The only time we should really chime in is if it's a respected member IMO and even then it really depends on the reason for the ban. The mods aren't just picking random people to ban, they have their reasons and are rarely going to be wrong.
I thought this whole issue had been resolved and the account unbanned, from my point of view, there's no need flogging on this matter any longer. Sometimes it's good to let the sleeping dog lie.
I understand your curiosity, but I don't see what it's supposed to achieve now. Theymos accepted his explanation and unbanned the account, are you trying to imply he had poor judgement on the matter?
Sometimes it's just better to leave a resolved matter as it is, especially when resolved by the principal (Theymos). Such demonstrates respect to the administrator's sound judgement and support to the victim. Allow the sleeping dog lie, that's all I can say for now.
He was not being honest. That alone should not be forgotten just because he got unbanned. I know another member who controversially got unbanned only to become a nuisance later and get banned again on top of received negative tags.
Let the members question why @ Dr.Bitcoin_Strange did what he did. There's nothing wrong with that. The decisions the mods make are sometimes independent of what the members discover. It doesn't mean the members are wrong.
IMO dishonesty might be grounds for a tag of some sort. Neutral obv so as to not be abusing the trust system. I also think mods should revisit their ban appeal and reban the account if new evidence was presented.