The point here is not who we choose over who because one is bigger than other. We run on evidence on this part of the thread, so do the ADR. And the casino gave the ADR the complete evidence of their findings for multiple accounts. The believe here is not due to a "bigger" casino aganist "small" player, its who provide detailed and verifiable evidence.
Edit: tidying quote
Edit: tidying quote
I run on evidence too. There is 0 verifiable evidence in the casinoguru thread. It's just their word vs my word. I am claiming I didn't multi account or falsify KYC, they said I did, and you are choosing to believe them over me. It is clear what's happening here. This case is not closed.
"And the casino gave the ADR the complete evidence of their findings for multiple accounts." I didn't see any of this so called "evidence" besides them just making circumstantial statements. I explained myself and my perspective too and addressed each of their suspicions. It's very clear this is not a fair argument.
But they do, in private, for the mediator's eyes only, in order to safeguard their detection algorithm, to not let public know what points [and how] they determine an account tied to another. The exchange of evidence is shown on these dialogues:
