Therefore, the focus should not be too much on self-imposition. It is okay to be aggressive because aggressive buying can still be justified but it must be in accordance with the financial limits we have, meaning that we can still balance our primary needs in real life and investments made without exceeding the income we get every month.
Being aggressive does not only mean buying a large amount directly but also those who make purchases without a limited time frame can also be said to be aggressive purchases, for example those who originally buy once a week are changed to a week 2 or 3 times it can also be an aggressive step taken and it is okay for them to do as long as they are aware of the risks and can minimize or manage their finances well so that what they do does not make them difficult at the end because they cannot bear the risks they have.
But even though this is okay to do, it doesn't mean we have to do it if we can't afford it because after all, a strategy like this certainly also triggers a much greater risk than ordinary purchases and when it will be done, we must indirectly be prepared with all forms of conditions which of course this is based on the economy we have.
Buying bitcoin does not mean that we go overboard at any particular time and/or with any particular purchase (or set of purchases) that we choose to make. If we make a mistake and we invest money that we actually need for our expenses, then we are overaggressively investing into bitcoin, and so if we merely call it being aggressive, we are ending up wrong and we have to suffer the consequences for our not knowing the difference between aggressive and overaggressive.
I understand and I agree with this statement but what I said earlier does not refer to purchases but to the definition of aggressiveness because I previously discussed aggressiveness so I gave more explanation because aggressiveness is not only buying a large amount directly but in the end aggressiveness can also refer to continuous purchases without knowing the time as I mentioned earlier. That also refers to the definition of aggressiveness in a purchase but the reference is only that it does not refer that we have to make such investments if we are not able to because of course all purchases must be adjusted according to our abilities in this sense refers to the economy where income and expenses that do need to be considered including for investments made.
I will agree with any assertion that it is better to error on the side of being less aggressive rather than making the mistake of employing overly aggressive practices, and probably it is even more important for beginners to error on the side of not overdoing it, especially while they are getting used to investing and perhaps even learning the boundaries of their cashflow management practices while they might also be building up their emergency funds too, while investing into bitcoin at the same time...so yeah, a balance is likely important to make sure that none of us ends up overdoing it and then recking ourselves in the early years of our bitcoin investment since it is likely important to keep building the bitcoin investment from a solid foundation without setting ourselves back due to our becoming too aggressive too soon.
We should want to survive in the short term, but also survive in the long term, and so building good habits from the start is good, yet at the same time, the more we get used to recognizing boundaries between aggressive and overaggressive then the more that we would be able to maximize our aggressiveness, while at the same time knowing that we are not overdoing it, such as also having back up funds available in case we make relatively small mistakes along the way of learning.
If talking about the issue of agreeing or not, of course I would also prefer to make regular purchases without having to make aggressive purchases so that we still feel comfortable with the purchases we make and do not feel burdened by it but in the end if someone really wants to do aggressively then as long as they are able to why not, but that does not mean all have to do that.
The key is back to finance because after all we have to measure the capacity we have in this case especially for investment matters because this is not just a toy to save money but there is hope that with the investments we make now there is hope that we can get optimal results in the future from the results we get from what we sowed before.