My point is there’s no scam happened. I defined scam as someone committed fraud that cause losses to others.
Obviously Little Mouse thinks that losses happened or he wouldn't bother to seek recovery from the participants. It doesn't really matter what your personal definition of "scam" is.
The user only broke the rules of account limit but in terms of work done he did a fair work on his side to get the payment therefore he didn’t scam the project rather just broke some rules.
I would say the work isn't "fair". For every alt account someone enrolls in a campaign on the forum, the brainpower of their posts are reduced in half. So if someone enrolls 4 accounts, the IQ of each post is only around 25% of what it should be.
I still don’t understand until now why the 1 account per campaign is still a thing now while there’s a lot of local board that obviously committing merit jerking to each other as an easy ticket to join campaigns.
Because some campaign managers value giving a chance to enroll in a campaign to as many people as possible over flooding the forum with as many spammy low-IQ posts as possible. If a CM feels "scammed" out of campaign funds, you're not in any position to contest that.