You’re conveniently ignoring the core of what I’ve been saying. I never disputed how house edge is typically calculated—I challenged whether Stake’s actual returns to players reflect the advertised house edge, especially when factoring in tampered outcomes and backend manipulation. There's a difference between the theoretical math and real-world implementation on a provably-unfair platform hiding behind the illusion of "provably fair."

Also, if the case was truly "disproven" on Page 1, why have there been 14+ pages of responses? Because people see something is off, even if you pretend otherwise.

And no, using Grok or calling out shills isn’t an “insult.” It’s pointing out what’s clear: a pattern of users defending a company under heavy fire from numerous credible allegations, while merit-farming in the process.


You say I’ve shown “no interest” in others' explanations, but I’ve reviewed every rebuttal. The problem is that no one has directly answered the real claims, which are laid out clearly in multiple threads, all backed by first-hand evidence:

🔗 Stake.com Censors Users, Blocks Withdrawals, and Now Steals Monthly VIP Bonuses 
→ Censored posts, withdrawal-only mode without cause, $6.57 VIP bonus for Platinum III status after thousands wagered.

🔗 Stake.com Exposed: The Dark Side of Online Crypto Casinos – Indian Users Beware 
→ Bank accounts blocked, no responsibility taken by Stake, support told users to “go to the police.”

🔗 🚨 STAKE.COM’S RTP IS A SCAM! MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE! 
→ The actual RTP players receive over large sample sizes is far lower than advertised, which mathematically shouldn’t happen unless the game is rigged.

Instead of actually addressing these with facts, people either:
- Talk down to me with generic textbook definitions of house edge.
- Claim I’m “angry” or “insulting,” while ignoring actual censorship, data manipulation, and fraud.
- Or suggest “ending the thread” without providing a single counterexample where Stake acted ethically in similar cases.

Also, I’ve filed reports with multiple authorities including the FBI, and have reason to fear for my safety due to the people involved in Stake’s operations. If anything happens to me, Stake.com and its founders must be held accountable. I’m not some “angry gambler”—I’m a whistleblower who lost hundreds of thousands and nearly my life to this industry.

If you want this to end, then prove me wrong with facts. But if the goal is to protect Stake’s image by silencing dissent, then you’re part of the problem—not the solution.